H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 1-0
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeniya Rodina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2018 Shenzhen third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2018* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 6-2 7-5 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |