Yingying Duan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 8, 2020 | H2H |
| Luksika Kumkhum | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 13, 2018 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Monica Puig
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yingying Duan vs Monica Puig.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Yingying Duan | Match data | Jan 6, 2018 | Q2 | Sydney International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,654 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,843 | 139 | 140 | 49.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Yingying Duan | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2014 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2016 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2016 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 2018 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | Career | 91 | 94 | 185 | 49.2% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 85/92 of Yingying Duan's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Yingying Duan | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2012 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 64.1% | 67.9% | 49.1% | 85.0% | 45.8% | 61.7% | 42.0% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 59.8% | 64.5% | 41.2% | 53.8% | 50.0% | 55.1% | 45.8% |
| 2013 | 5/5 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 65.5% | 58.9% | 40.6% | 29.4% | 56.0% | 52.3% | 42.5% | 2012 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 62.5% | 53.1% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 57.8% | 30.0% |
| 2014 | 5/7 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 61.4% | 60.9% | 46.0% | 57.6% | 51.7% | 54.9% | 39.8% | 2013 | 27/28 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 62.4% | 62.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% | 51.2% | 58.1% | 43.0% |
| 2015 | 9/13 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 61.2% | 71.3% | 44.9% | 55.4% | 39.5% | 60.8% | 39.4% | 2014 | 33/34 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 59.8% | 66.4% | 46.7% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 58.4% | 42.7% |
| 2016 | 14/15 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 65.4% | 66.2% | 44.5% | 56.6% | 43.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2015 | 32/38 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 65.2% | 51.0% | 50.2% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 38.4% |
| 2017 | 28/28 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 61.1% | 42.7% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 55.1% | 39.7% | 2016 | 52/65 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 62.0% | 64.8% | 49.8% | 58.7% | 46.5% | 59.0% | 44.7% |
| 2018 | 16/16 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 67.8% | 63.8% | 37.4% | 61.2% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 41.0% | 2017 | 39/41 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.6% | 47.8% | 54.0% | 45.1% | 58.7% | 42.8% |
| 2019 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 64.4% | 40.2% | 43.6% | 33.0% | 55.4% | 35.6% | 2018 | 31/32 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 61.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 52.7% | 48.6% | 58.6% | 42.1% |
| 2020 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 70.4% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 24.5% | 2019 | 33/35 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 62.5% | 66.1% | 48.0% | 60.1% | 51.9% | 59.1% | 44.1% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 64.6% | 55.7% | 28.2% | 29.8% | 28.6% | 46.0% | 34.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 60.3% | 51.2% | 33.3% | 53.8% | 33.3% | 44.1% | 32.7% |
| Career | 85/92 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 63.7% | 42.3% | 54.3% | 46.1% | 56.4% | 40.1% | Career | 252/279 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 61.2% | 65.2% | 48.4% | 53.3% | 47.8% | 58.6% | 42.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Yingying Duan | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2012 | 1508 | 106.9 | -0.29 | -0.87 | 1.098 | 51.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | 2011 | 1492 | 103.5 | -1.04 | -2.47 | 1.020 | 50.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.15 |
| 2013 | 1511 | 104.6 | -0.82 | -0.25 | 0.890 | 47.5% | +21 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 | 2012 | 1464 | 94.8 | -3.46 | -3.96 | 0.711 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 2014 | 1477 | 101.2 | -1.58 | -1.40 | 0.882 | 47.6% | +14 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.69 | 2013 | 1571 | 123.3 | +1.46 | -0.93 | 1.027 | 50.5% | -93 | +68 | +69 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | +0.09 |
| 2015 | 1517 | 106.8 | +0.96 | -1.58 | 1.004 | 49.9% | -2 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.33 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.5 | +0.60 | 2014 | 1615 | 129.5 | +1.33 | -0.33 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -75 | +119 | 0 | 48.7% | +0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.29 |
| 2016 | 1538 | 108.9 | +0.86 | -0.78 | 1.017 | 50.6% | -26 | — | — | 48.6% | -0.06 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | +1.24 | 2015 | 1579 | 121.9 | +0.62 | -2.26 | 0.948 | 49.1% | +9 | +55 | -13 | 42.4% | -0.19 | 3–8 (27%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.9 | -0.38 |
| 2017 | 1583 | 117.0 | -0.51 | -2.33 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +30 | -93 | -6 | 39.3% | -0.93 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.8 | +0.64 | 2016 | 1771 | 137.9 | +2.19 | +1.46 | 1.092 | 52.0% | -9 | -57 | -89 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.8 | -0.14 |
| 2018 | 1573 | 127.1 | -0.70 | -1.07 | 0.927 | 48.5% | +3 | — | — | 39.5% | -0.55 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 | 2017 | 1724 | 133.3 | +2.17 | -0.36 | 1.036 | 50.7% | +15 | -63 | — | 47.4% | -0.04 | 8–9 (47%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | -0.88 |
| 2019 | 1542 | 109.9 | -0.01 | -4.94 | 0.799 | 45.8% | +17 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.18 | 2018 | 1780 | 137.8 | +0.96 | +0.23 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +6 | — | — | 56.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| 2020 | 1533 | 102.9 | +0.45 | -3.00 | 0.551 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2019 | 1686 | 127.3 | +1.69 | +0.90 | 1.076 | 51.5% | -34 | +39 | -64 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | 92.6 | -0.89 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1624 | 94.4 | -0.47 | -3.91 | 0.644 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1619 | 101.3 | +0.44 | +1.01 | 0.584 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| Career | 1655 | 118.7 | -0.20 | -1.71 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +8 | -93 | -6 | 40.4% | -0.66 | 12–16 (43%) | 11–15 (42%) | 97.2 | +3.00 | Career | 1843 | 134.9 | +1.52 | -0.09 | 1.029 | 50.7% | -18 | +21 | -39 | 50.3% | +0.16 | 40–50 (44%) | 29–34 (46%) | 100.5 | -1.10 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Monica Puig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 24, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 24, 2018 | H2H |