H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Vania King H2H: 1-0
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2016 Jiangxi Open final 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2016* | Jiangxi Open | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Yingying Duan | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |