H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 2-1
Yulia Putintseva holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on clay, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2019 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 7-6(1) | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 6-3 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2017* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Barbora Strycova | 6-3 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Barbora Strycova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |