H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 0-1
Jelena Jankovic holds a 1–0 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2012 Copenhagen fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 6-1 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |