H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Rebecca Sramkova H2H: 0-2
Rebecca Sramkova holds a 2–0 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Sramkova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rebecca Sramkova won the 2025 Nottingham fourth round 6-1 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 29
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2025 | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Rebecca Sramkova | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| May 18, 2025 | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Rebecca Sramkova | 6-0 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 260 | 254 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Rebecca Sramkova | #131 | #34 | 1,440 | 1,810 | 47 | 49 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Rebecca Sramkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #321 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #169 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #46 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |