H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Yulia Putintseva vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2016 Wuhan third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yulia Putintseva
KAZ Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 28, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #7 6-3 6-2 Yulia Putintseva #36 Match data
Apr 8, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Yulia Putintseva #61 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 Venus Williams #14 Match data
Feb 13, 2016* Kaohsiung WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #12 7-5 6-3 Yulia Putintseva #64 Match data
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #16 7-6(5) 6-4 Yulia Putintseva #95 Match data
Aug 7, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #26 6-3 6-2 Yulia Putintseva #164 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yulia Putintseva #82 #20 2,138 1,991 261 255 50.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yulia Putintseva Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2010 0–1 0.0% #728 1,489 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2012 1–2 33.3% #123 1,489 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2013 5–12 29.4% #109 1,509 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2014 5–6 45.5% #115 1,555 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2015 10–17 37.0% #77 1,523 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2016 26–22 54.2% #33 1,655 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2017 20–27 42.6% #52 1,605 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2018 17–19 47.2% #44 1,656 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2019 28–23 54.9% #34 1,757 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2020 15–10 60.0% #28 1,836 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2021 31–21 59.6% #42 1,816 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2022 20–18 52.6% #51 1,740 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2023 22–22 50.0% #66 1,744 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2024 34–17 66.7% #29 1,934 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2025 15–26 36.6% #71 1,740 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2026 12–12 50.0% #82 1,783 0 4 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47