H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 1-3
Viktorija Golubic holds a 3–1 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Viktorija Golubic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Viktorija Golubic won the 2025 Jiujiang quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | Jiujiang | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 7-5 6-2 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2024* | Hua Hin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 7-6(0) 7-6(1) | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Viktorija Golubic | 6-4 7-6(3) | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |