H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yvonne Meusburger vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-1
Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Yvonne Meusburger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2014 Baku third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2014* | Baku | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-2 6-4 | Yvonne Meusburger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Meusburger | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |