H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-3
Kathy Horvath holds a 3–1 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1985 Hilton Head second round 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1985* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| May 6, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yvonne Vermaak | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Nov 30, 1981* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1981* | Boise | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yvonne Vermaak | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |