H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-0
Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1982 Lugano third round 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1982* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-3 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Vermaak | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |