Zarina Diyas
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Zarina Diyas and Daniela Hantuchova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2015 Pattaya round of 32 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Zarina Diyas | Match data | Feb 12, 2015* | R32 | Pattaya | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Zarina Diyas | 7-5 6-1 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data | Jan 15, 2015* | R16 | Hobart International | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,756 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 461 | 365 | 55.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,863 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #77 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,692 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,571 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,526 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 18 | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 19 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 20 | 2014 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 21 | 2015 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2016 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2017 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 36 | 18 | 54 | 66.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2020 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 23 | 15 | 38 | 60.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 24 | 18 | 42 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21 | 19 | 40 | 52.5% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 32 | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 85 | 153 | 44.4% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 290 | 239 | 529 | 54.8% | 79 | 67 | 146 | 54.1% | 66 | 39 | 105 | 62.9% | 26 | 20 | 46 | 56.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2/3 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 53.3% | 69.6% | 41.1% | 60.7% | 64.6% | 56.3% | 58.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 57.9% | 62.6% | 42.3% | 41.2% | 52.3% | 53.9% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 61.8% | 61.5% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 59.0% | 54.1% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 42.5% | 60.7% | 29.5% | 23.6% | 45.0% | 41.7% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 67.7% | 55.4% | 61.1% | 72.7% | 64.6% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 32/34 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 68.2% | 58.4% | 47.3% | 49.4% | 51.1% | 55.1% | 45.8% | 2003 | 7/49 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 61.5% | 62.8% | 53.0% | 46.0% | 45.9% | 59.1% | 46.5% |
| 21 | 2015 | 41/47 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 71.2% | 57.9% | 47.0% | 48.3% | 51.6% | 54.7% | 44.1% | 2004 | 8/50 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 62.1% | 44.2% | 43.0% | 64.2% | 55.1% | 40.9% |
| 22 | 2016 | 20/20 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 60.5% | 41.6% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 54.9% | 43.9% | 2005 | 15/63 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 58.2% | 69.2% | 46.3% | 50.6% | 45.0% | 59.1% | 47.9% |
| 23 | 2017 | 11/11 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 68.1% | 64.5% | 46.2% | 53.5% | 57.0% | 58.7% | 45.1% | 2006 | 42/60 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 63.8% | 66.1% | 44.7% | 56.1% | 46.8% | 58.5% | 42.5% |
| 24 | 2018 | 32/32 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.4% | 48.3% | 52.6% | 44.3% | 56.7% | 42.8% | 2007 | 74/78 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 65.4% | 68.4% | 47.9% | 58.5% | 49.2% | 61.2% | 45.2% |
| 25 | 2019 | 20/20 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 59.4% | 44.8% | 45.3% | 36.7% | 55.0% | 42.1% | 2008 | 36/42 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 64.4% | 64.5% | 45.8% | 57.0% | 50.2% | 57.8% | 43.5% |
| 26 | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 74.3% | 57.0% | 47.6% | 53.8% | 48.6% | 54.4% | 44.2% | 2009 | 57/61 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 63.3% | 63.3% | 46.3% | 49.7% | 49.1% | 57.1% | 43.5% |
| 27 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 60.0% | 42.6% | 48.1% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 41.3% | 2010 | 49/56 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 64.9% | 64.3% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 49.4% | 58.1% | 43.8% |
| 28 | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 70.2% | 56.2% | 67.7% | 66.7% | 20.0% | 59.6% | 33.6% | 2011 | 64/66 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 62.8% | 65.9% | 49.7% | 59.9% | 47.6% | 59.8% | 45.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 38/47 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 62.2% | 63.6% | 45.7% | 53.2% | 51.4% | 56.9% | 41.3% |
| 30 | 2024 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 70.9% | 46.7% | 31.4% | 45.5% | 38.8% | 42.6% | 40.0% | 2013 | 42/47 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 60.9% | 63.1% | 43.8% | 50.7% | 46.6% | 55.7% | 41.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 37/40 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 62.5% | 61.8% | 44.7% | 51.5% | 43.1% | 55.5% | 41.5% |
| 32 | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 61.0% | 31.6% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 51.7% | 36.4% | 2015 | 32/34 | 2.1 | 3.9 | 66.6% | 62.2% | 47.7% | 44.5% | 46.3% | 57.3% | 39.7% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9/10 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 60.6% | 53.1% | 39.7% | 35.1% | 52.9% | 48.3% | 38.7% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 65.7% | 66.4% | 37.9% | 50.0% | 39.2% | 56.7% | 41.9% |
| Career | — | 217/227 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 45.4% | 49.3% | 48.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% | — | 512/826 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 63.4% | 64.6% | 46.5% | 53.3% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 43.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1528 | 105.5 | +0.98 | +1.13 | 1.348 | 57.6% | — | +48 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 1539 | 114.4 | +0.14 | -1.62 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +19 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.8 | -0.06 | 1999 | 1494 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 17 | 2011 | 1505 | 103.6 | -1.72 | -1.18 | 0.875 | 47.5% | +17 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.16 | 2000 | 1550 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -2 | — | 44.8% | -0.73 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.1 | +0.04 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1477 | 95.3 | -2.37 | -3.62 | 0.739 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | 2001 | 1710 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | -61 | -102 | +42 | 55.0% | +0.45 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.9 | -1.24 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1478 | 100.3 | -1.99 | -0.40 | 1.012 | 50.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.60 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.31 | 2002 | 1920 | 160.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -168 | -31 | 63.3% | +1.02 | 13–9 (59%) | 10–4 (71%) | 108.1 | +1.09 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1683 | 130.0 | -0.83 | +1.87 | 1.021 | 50.5% | -29 | -121 | -28 | 57.5% | +0.52 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.0 | +0.75 | 2003 | 1752 | 137.7 | +1.71 | +1.73 | 1.137 | 52.9% | +26 | +6 | +110 | 50.9% | -0.12 | 9–5 (64%) | 12–5 (71%) | 106.4 | +2.36 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1561 | 125.0 | -2.62 | +2.02 | 0.975 | 49.5% | -15 | -26 | +133 | 47.0% | -0.32 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 91.8 | +1.00 | 2004 | 1710 | 131.4 | +0.32 | -0.58 | 0.910 | 48.4% | +1 | -22 | +176 | 46.7% | -0.17 | 11–6 (65%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.9 | -0.74 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1553 | 119.4 | -0.44 | +0.63 | 0.974 | 49.5% | +1 | -18 | — | 42.6% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.38 | 2005 | 1863 | 153.2 | +2.43 | +2.83 | 1.170 | 53.1% | +26 | -199 | -56 | 56.1% | +0.53 | 13–6 (68%) | 6–8 (43%) | 103.6 | -0.05 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1665 | 121.5 | +1.12 | +0.16 | 1.091 | 52.1% | +6 | — | +15 | 57.7% | +0.73 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.1 | +0.69 | 2006 | 1838 | 147.6 | +2.67 | -0.32 | 1.025 | 50.7% | +7 | -127 | +7 | 54.0% | +0.26 | 17–8 (68%) | 8–4 (67%) | 107.0 | +0.07 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1718 | 138.2 | -0.01 | -0.24 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +12 | -125 | — | 44.9% | -0.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -2.35 | 2007 | 1932 | 154.4 | +5.20 | +1.87 | 1.165 | 53.3% | -6 | -130 | +1 | 63.3% | +0.90 | 15–10 (60%) | 14–4 (78%) | 108.1 | +2.67 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1704 | 128.4 | -1.13 | -1.09 | 0.937 | 48.5% | +30 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.58 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 2008 | 1757 | 140.8 | +2.10 | -0.03 | 1.032 | 50.5% | +2 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.13 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | 97.7 | +0.80 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1660 | 115.9 | -0.51 | +0.34 | 0.969 | 49.6% | +68 | -136 | — | 44.8% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.0 | -0.43 | 2009 | 1809 | 138.5 | +1.75 | -0.25 | 1.015 | 50.3% | -33 | -39 | +107 | 55.7% | +0.39 | 18–9 (67%) | 11–5 (69%) | 106.6 | +1.00 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1688 | 125.7 | -1.93 | -1.44 | 0.902 | 47.7% | +47 | -117 | -89 | 43.8% | -0.62 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | -1.46 | 2010 | 1782 | 145.6 | +2.86 | +0.69 | 1.046 | 51.1% | -3 | -1 | +88 | 55.6% | +0.57 | 10–10 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.2 | -1.22 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1681 | 107.4 | -0.79 | +5.23 | 0.833 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.23 | 2011 | 1791 | 150.0 | +3.89 | +1.34 | 1.119 | 52.5% | -42 | +70 | +168 | 60.4% | +0.95 | 11–10 (52%) | 8–9 (47%) | 99.6 | -1.84 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1692 | 138.5 | +1.52 | -0.83 | 0.958 | 49.3% | +8 | — | +159 | 46.3% | -0.01 | 12–6 (67%) | 5–11 (31%) | 98.0 | -1.10 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1631 | 100.1 | -0.16 | -2.90 | 0.697 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2013 | 1684 | 132.7 | +0.51 | -1.74 | 0.944 | 48.9% | -14 | +86 | +204 | 48.1% | +0.01 | 12–6 (67%) | 5–8 (38%) | 100.2 | +1.34 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1549 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1571 | 119.0 | -0.43 | -1.17 | 0.933 | 48.4% | -17 | +164 | +244 | 39.5% | -0.75 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–2 | — | +2.28 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1546 | 107.0 | -0.57 | -1.68 | 0.752 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 | 2015 | 1573 | 117.2 | -0.30 | -2.09 | 0.931 | 48.5% | -5 | +70 | +227 | 43.0% | -0.67 | 7–4 (64%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.6 | -0.22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1514 | 111.4 | -2.93 | -2.64 | 0.748 | 43.7% | -12 | — | +237 | 18.2% | -2.18 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.58 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1527 | 110.5 | -1.92 | +0.79 | 0.967 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.21 |
| Career | — | 1756 | 131.4 | -1.07 | +0.30 | 0.966 | 49.3% | +8 | -81 | +46 | 46.2% | -0.25 | 32–36 (47%) | 22–29 (43%) | 97.4 | -0.47 | — | 1968 | 147.9 | +2.22 | +0.08 | 1.029 | 50.6% | -7 | -28 | +111 | 53.5% | +0.29 | 166–112 (60%) | 112–90 (55%) | 107.0 | +0.52 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | 10 | 8 | 18 | Oct 16, 2010 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jan 20, 2016 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 4 | 11 | 15 | Sep 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 6 | 5 | 11 | May 13, 2015 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 9 | 11 | Jan 31, 2014 | H2H |