H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 0-1

Eugenie Bouchard holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eugenie Bouchard won the 2015 Italian Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Eugenie Bouchard
Canada Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eugenie Bouchard #6 6-3 6-4 Zarina Diyas #34 Match data May 14, 2015* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,927 158 147 51.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Eugenie Bouchard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,546 0 0
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,751 0 0
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,862 0 1
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,701 0 1
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0 2016 29–24 54.7% #46 1,697 0 1
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1 2017 11–20 35.5% #81 1,601 0 1
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1
25 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,617 0 1
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,713 0 1
27 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,704 0 1
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,632 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,637 0 1
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,610 0 1
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zarina Diyas Eugenie Bouchard
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 15 11 26 57.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 18 16 34 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 20 16 36 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
23 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
27 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — 98 101 199 49.2% 45 29 74 60.8% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zarina Diyas Eugenie Bouchard
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1% 2011 4/4 2.0 2.5 64.1% 64.4% 38.1% 59.9% 56.7% 54.8% 34.9%
18 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1% 2012 9/9 3.7 3.1 58.4% 66.2% 47.0% 58.4% 39.6% 58.4% 43.0%
19 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8% 2013 34/42 2.3 2.6 56.8% 64.2% 47.1% 51.2% 44.0% 56.7% 46.5%
20 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8% 2014 57/62 2.6 3.1 60.4% 66.0% 47.6% 54.0% 50.3% 58.5% 46.5%
21 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1% 2015 25/29 1.7 4.0 60.1% 62.4% 47.7% 49.2% 48.0% 56.8% 41.5%
22 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9% 2016 50/54 2.3 3.2 60.4% 63.6% 48.8% 50.2% 45.9% 57.8% 44.7%
23 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1% 2017 28/31 2.3 3.5 58.3% 58.7% 45.0% 49.3% 48.3% 53.0% 42.7%
24 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8% 2018 24/24 3.0 3.6 59.2% 63.1% 44.0% 57.2% 46.4% 55.5% 44.2%
25 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1% 2019 14/14 1.3 4.0 60.7% 60.7% 42.3% 50.0% 54.0% 53.3% 42.9%
26 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2% 2020 14/14 2.8 1.8 65.5% 65.3% 49.8% 61.5% 49.6% 59.8% 45.5%
27 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3% 2021 7/7 2.7 2.9 62.7% 65.2% 45.7% 49.6% 50.9% 57.9% 46.8%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6% 2022 8/8 2.8 1.5 57.0% 61.4% 51.7% 60.8% 45.3% 57.3% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 6/6 2.3 1.7 66.8% 62.6% 52.8% 41.7% 51.9% 59.0% 43.5%
30 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 1.0 2.0 62.0% 59.5% 47.9% 54.2% 37.4% 55.1% 41.8%
32 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4% — 282/306 2.4 3.1 60.0% 63.5% 47.1% 52.6% 47.7% 56.9% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zarina Diyas Eugenie Bouchard
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16 2011 1493 102.7 -1.04 -2.27 0.773 45.8% +18 — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
18 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2012 1546 114.3 +1.12 -0.43 1.033 50.7% +7 — — 52.4% +0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
19 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31 2013 1752 141.5 +1.07 +2.65 1.074 51.5% -37 -74 -156 58.2% +0.47 7–9 (44%) 8–1 (89%) 106.1 -1.18
20 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75 2014 1863 150.8 +2.70 +3.29 1.122 52.4% -96 +19 -107 61.4% +0.82 10–8 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.2 -1.19
21 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00 2015 1702 123.0 -1.20 +0.51 0.961 49.3% +34 +67 -27 50.0% -0.02 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 94.8 +1.50
22 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38 2016 1697 133.5 +1.68 +1.09 1.060 51.1% -16 +85 -6 54.6% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 -1.41
23 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69 2017 1602 127.4 -1.89 -0.77 0.909 47.9% -17 +221 +25 40.3% -0.82 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.2 -0.95
24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35 2018 1670 127.3 -0.75 +1.08 0.994 49.8% -14 +151 — 42.2% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.6 +0.16
25 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02 2019 1617 127.0 -1.49 -0.31 0.919 47.9% +26 — — 38.2% -0.62 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.76
26 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43 2020 1713 127.8 +1.82 +1.44 1.130 52.7% -64 +114 — 65.7% +1.00 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 +0.41
27 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46 2021 1704 112.6 +0.44 +0.05 1.114 52.1% -53 — — 53.3% +0.40 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.45
28 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23 2022 1633 117.1 +0.22 +0.59 0.998 50.2% -38 — — 52.9% +0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.2 +0.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1637 118.3 +0.17 -0.98 1.060 51.3% — +151 — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +1.03
30 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15 2024 1618 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1611 113.9 +1.04 -0.76 0.931 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — 0.00
32 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47 — 1927 140.4 +0.68 +1.24 1.032 50.6% -27 +65 -55 53.1% +0.19 43–57 (43%) 45–29 (61%) 102.0 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.