H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Zarina Diyas vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-0
Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2018 Hiroshima fourth round 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2021 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Kateryna Baindl | 6-4 6-4 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |