Zarina Diyas
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Zarina Diyas vs Nicole Gibbs
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Zarina Diyas vs Nicole Gibbs.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Nicole Gibbs | Match data | Mar 5, 2019 | Q2 | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,756 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,690 | 33 | 59 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #77 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2014 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2017 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2016 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2018 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 85 | 153 | 44.4% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | — | 31 | 47 | 78 | 39.7% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 83/94 of Nicole Gibbs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2/3 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 53.3% | 69.6% | 41.1% | 60.7% | 64.6% | 56.3% | 58.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 57.9% | 62.6% | 42.3% | 41.2% | 52.3% | 53.9% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 61.8% | 61.5% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 59.0% | 54.1% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 42.5% | 60.7% | 29.5% | 23.6% | 45.0% | 41.7% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 67.7% | 55.4% | 61.1% | 72.7% | 64.6% | 35.8% | 2012 | 6/6 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 56.5% | 54.1% | 41.4% | 46.9% | 35.9% | 48.3% | 39.5% |
| 20 | 2014 | 32/34 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 68.2% | 58.4% | 47.3% | 49.4% | 51.1% | 55.1% | 45.8% | 2013 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 57.4% | 53.7% | 40.6% | 46.8% | 39.6% | 48.2% | 45.0% |
| 21 | 2015 | 41/47 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 71.2% | 57.9% | 47.0% | 48.3% | 51.6% | 54.7% | 44.1% | 2014 | 9/11 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 55.4% | 61.2% | 46.0% | 53.0% | 53.3% | 54.7% | 37.3% |
| 22 | 2016 | 20/20 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 60.5% | 41.6% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 54.9% | 43.9% | 2015 | 11/15 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 55.5% | 58.8% | 49.3% | 51.0% | 46.2% | 54.6% | 43.3% |
| 23 | 2017 | 11/11 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 68.1% | 64.5% | 46.2% | 53.5% | 57.0% | 58.7% | 45.1% | 2016 | 25/29 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 61.3% | 63.6% | 43.8% | 50.2% | 48.1% | 55.9% | 44.7% |
| 24 | 2018 | 32/32 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.4% | 48.3% | 52.6% | 44.3% | 56.7% | 42.8% | 2017 | 18/19 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 60.2% | 58.8% | 42.9% | 52.5% | 38.7% | 52.3% | 40.6% |
| 25 | 2019 | 20/20 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 59.4% | 44.8% | 45.3% | 36.7% | 55.0% | 42.1% | 2018 | 7/7 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 41.8% | 40.3% | 37.7% | 52.4% | 35.7% |
| 26 | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 74.3% | 57.0% | 47.6% | 53.8% | 48.6% | 54.4% | 44.2% | 2019 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 59.6% | 56.6% | 40.1% | 59.7% | 34.7% | 50.1% | 44.6% |
| 27 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 60.0% | 42.6% | 48.1% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 41.3% | 2020 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 60.4% | 70.3% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 40.0% | 62.3% | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 70.2% | 56.2% | 67.7% | 66.7% | 20.0% | 59.6% | 33.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 70.9% | 46.7% | 31.4% | 45.5% | 38.8% | 42.6% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 61.0% | 31.6% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 51.7% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 217/227 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 45.4% | 49.3% | 48.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% | — | 83/94 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 58.9% | 60.1% | 44.0% | 50.4% | 43.7% | 53.6% | 41.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1528 | 105.5 | +0.98 | +1.13 | 1.348 | 57.6% | — | +48 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 1539 | 114.4 | +0.14 | -1.62 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +19 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.8 | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1505 | 103.6 | -1.72 | -1.18 | 0.875 | 47.5% | +17 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1477 | 95.3 | -2.37 | -3.62 | 0.739 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1478 | 100.3 | -1.99 | -0.40 | 1.012 | 50.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.60 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.31 | 2012 | 1505 | 109.0 | -2.02 | +0.08 | 0.764 | 44.2% | +11 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1683 | 130.0 | -0.83 | +1.87 | 1.021 | 50.5% | -29 | -121 | -28 | 57.5% | +0.52 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.0 | +0.75 | 2013 | 1509 | 106.7 | -1.19 | -0.03 | 0.868 | 46.6% | +9 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.09 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1561 | 125.0 | -2.62 | +2.02 | 0.975 | 49.5% | -15 | -26 | +133 | 47.0% | -0.32 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 91.8 | +1.00 | 2014 | 1547 | 108.6 | -2.13 | -2.66 | 0.824 | 46.3% | +25 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.93 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1553 | 119.4 | -0.44 | +0.63 | 0.974 | 49.5% | +1 | -18 | — | 42.6% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.38 | 2015 | 1504 | 106.2 | -2.08 | +0.98 | 0.955 | 49.1% | +51 | -19 | — | 30.3% | -1.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–5 (0%) | 94.8 | +0.39 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1665 | 121.5 | +1.12 | +0.16 | 1.091 | 52.1% | +6 | — | +15 | 57.7% | +0.73 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.1 | +0.69 | 2016 | 1579 | 124.9 | -0.86 | +1.29 | 1.013 | 50.2% | +27 | -135 | — | 45.8% | -0.20 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1718 | 138.2 | -0.01 | -0.24 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +12 | -125 | — | 44.9% | -0.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -2.35 | 2017 | 1546 | 114.2 | -2.56 | -1.08 | 0.851 | 46.5% | +3 | — | — | 37.2% | -1.12 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.04 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1704 | 128.4 | -1.13 | -1.09 | 0.937 | 48.5% | +30 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.58 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 2018 | 1513 | 110.7 | +0.08 | -2.80 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +14 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1660 | 115.9 | -0.51 | +0.34 | 0.969 | 49.6% | +68 | -136 | — | 44.8% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.0 | -0.43 | 2019 | 1579 | 116.8 | +0.94 | +1.74 | 0.894 | 47.3% | +1 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.37 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1688 | 125.7 | -1.93 | -1.44 | 0.902 | 47.7% | +47 | -117 | -89 | 43.8% | -0.62 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | -1.46 | 2020 | 1573 | 109.7 | -1.74 | +0.55 | 0.883 | 48.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1681 | 107.4 | -0.79 | +5.23 | 0.833 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 1631 | 100.1 | -0.16 | -2.90 | 0.697 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 1549 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1546 | 107.0 | -0.57 | -1.69 | 0.752 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1756 | 131.4 | -1.07 | +0.30 | 0.966 | 49.3% | +8 | -81 | +46 | 46.2% | -0.25 | 32–36 (47%) | 22–29 (43%) | 97.4 | -0.47 | — | 1690 | 120.8 | -1.49 | -0.17 | 0.895 | 47.6% | +20 | -69 | — | 38.2% | -0.92 | 10–17 (37%) | 5–8 (38%) | 92.7 | +1.11 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nicole Gibbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 13, 2017 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Heather Watson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 16, 2016 | H2H |