H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 1-0

Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2015 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Urszula Radwanska
Poland Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zarina Diyas #31 3-6 6-4 6-2 Urszula Radwanska #149 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Urszula Radwanska #493 #29 1,565 1,746 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Urszula Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0 2006 2–3 40.0% #313 1,525 0 0
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 2007 3–3 50.0% #252 1,539 0 0
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #129 1,516 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0 2009 16–22 42.1% #70 1,555 0 0
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #193 1,551 0 0
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0 2011 10–11 47.6% #105 1,575 0 0
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0 2012 27–25 51.9% #31 1,710 0 0
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0 2013 21–23 47.7% #40 1,700 0 0
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1 2014 3–11 21.4% #179 1,594 0 0
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1 2015 12–15 44.4% #94 1,579 0 0
25 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1 2016 2–5 28.6% #257 1,531 0 0
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1 2021 0–4 0.0% #231 1,452 0 0
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zarina Diyas Urszula Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
22 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — 75 91 166 45.2% 9 23 32 28.1% 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 200/226 of Urszula Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zarina Diyas Urszula Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8% 2007 4/6 1.5 3.8 64.3% 55.8% 45.7% 50.0% 48.7% 52.4% 48.0%
17 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1% 2008 4/9 1.3 3.5 59.3% 56.9% 33.2% 47.1% 47.8% 47.0% 42.7%
18 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1% 2009 34/38 2.2 2.6 61.6% 60.4% 41.4% 49.8% 45.7% 53.2% 43.1%
19 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8% 2010 3/4 0.7 1.3 63.0% 52.2% 49.3% 55.6% 33.3% 51.5% 40.4%
20 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8% 2011 18/21 1.7 2.4 63.9% 59.7% 46.4% 47.9% 46.4% 54.8% 46.5%
21 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1% 2012 49/52 2.0 2.4 65.4% 60.6% 42.6% 50.7% 48.2% 54.2% 45.3%
22 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9% 2013 42/44 1.6 2.1 66.3% 56.2% 43.8% 49.5% 50.6% 52.1% 45.3%
23 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1% 2014 14/14 0.8 2.9 62.6% 54.9% 41.5% 37.6% 52.7% 49.8% 43.6%
24 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8% 2015 21/27 1.6 2.5 67.3% 57.1% 45.4% 46.9% 51.4% 52.9% 43.0%
25 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1% 2016 7/7 1.3 4.1 58.3% 52.7% 49.6% 30.9% 43.8% 51.8% 45.2%
26 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0% 2021 4/4 1.8 4.3 60.3% 51.2% 47.7% 51.6% 26.2% 49.9% 33.4%
32 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4% — 200/231 1.7 2.5 64.3% 58.0% 43.5% 48.0% 48.0% 52.8% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zarina Diyas Urszula Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06 2006 1525 115.3 — — — — — +24 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — -0.64
16 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06 2007 1539 110.6 -1.56 -0.20 1.009 50.0% +22 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.39
17 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16 2008 1517 107.6 -2.91 -0.90 0.806 45.0% +3 — — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.54
18 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2009 1555 121.6 -1.78 -0.41 0.921 48.0% -11 -56 +108 42.5% -0.65 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 108.8 +0.15
19 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31 2010 1552 113.9 +0.83 +2.32 0.833 46.6% -5 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.32
20 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75 2011 1575 116.1 -1.08 +0.22 1.028 50.6% +16 -91 — 48.1% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 +1.19
21 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00 2012 1710 130.1 -1.38 +2.06 0.990 49.6% -35 -192 -2 49.1% -0.05 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.60
22 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38 2013 1700 138.3 -2.18 +1.30 0.945 48.6% +10 -144 -15 44.9% -0.39 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 111.9 -1.35
23 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69 2014 1595 109.0 -3.72 -0.43 0.869 47.1% +59 -95 — 25.9% -1.56 0–3 (0%) — — -1.04
24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35 2015 1579 115.7 -3.71 +0.71 0.914 47.8% +43 — +45 45.0% -0.53 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 102.8 -0.35
25 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02 2016 1532 111.4 -0.85 +0.76 0.939 48.4% +53 — — 42.9% -0.07 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.48
26 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43 2017 1519 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46 2018 1506 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23 2019 1484 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1466 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15 2021 1453 105.6 -1.63 -4.19 0.666 42.3% +42 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.17
31 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1441 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.69 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2023 1428 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1441 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1426 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1432 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47 — 1747 127.6 -1.98 +0.73 0.940 48.6% +7 -111 +29 43.8% -0.43 31–31 (50%) 25–20 (56%) 106.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.