H2H data updated: 2026-11-08 00:00 UTC

Zi Yan vs Emma Laine H2H: 0-1

Emma Laine holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Laine leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Laine won the 2006 Pattaya Open round of 32 6-1 3-6 6-4.

HKG Age 41 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
FIN Age 40 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emma Laine #78 6-1 3-6 6-4 Zi Yan #77 Match data Feb 9, 2006* R32 Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zi Yan — #40 678 1,621 34 58 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Emma Laine — #50 429 1,577 21 38 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zi Yan Emma Laine
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #843 1,487 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #297 1,486 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #870 1,472 0 0
18 2003 2–3 40.0% #161 1,486 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #166 1,489 0 0
19 2004 0–4 0.0% #296 1,451 0 0 2005 4–6 40.0% #92 1,505 0 0
20 2005 8–4 66.7% #104 1,573 0 1 2006 13–22 37.1% #74 1,525 0 0
21 2006 6–16 27.3% #166 1,484 0 1 2007 2–6 25.0% #247 1,492 0 0
22 2007 10–12 45.5% #58 1,544 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #399 1,503 0 0
23 2008 7–14 33.3% #126 1,528 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #306 1,486 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2010 1–1 50.0% #422 1,495 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zi Yan Emma Laine
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 12 15 27 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2007 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 37 61 39.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — 20 28 48 41.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Zi Yan's and 29/55 of Emma Laine's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zi Yan Emma Laine
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/10 0.5 1.0 70.3% 49.9% 50.0% 43.9% 23.1% 50.0% 40.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 18/35 1.1 2.9 60.4% 63.3% 43.0% 52.2% 48.3% 56.3% 44.5%
21 2006 10/22 1.8 3.3 64.1% 56.8% 43.0% 56.3% 48.9% 52.2% 41.1% 2007 7/8 1.4 2.1 59.5% 57.7% 41.8% 52.4% 55.2% 50.8% 41.0%
22 2007 18/22 1.3 2.6 65.3% 60.0% 45.6% 47.1% 55.2% 54.9% 44.5% 2008 2/2 1.0 4.5 45.7% 60.6% 41.0% 56.3% 50.0% 49.4% 44.3%
23 2008 20/21 0.9 3.6 63.5% 56.5% 41.5% 49.7% 43.3% 51.0% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 2/3 1.0 4.5 62.7% 53.0% 39.2% 33.3% 47.3% 47.8% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.7% 53.2% 38.5% 39.3% 33.6% 47.7% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52/92 1.2 3.2 64.2% 57.5% 43.0% 49.1% 48.3% 52.3% 43.7% — 29/59 1.1 2.7 59.9% 60.8% 43.1% 51.9% 48.3% 54.1% 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zi Yan Emma Laine
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.01
17 2002 1486 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 2003 1472 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.10
18 2003 1486 102.0 — — — — +30 — — 45.5% -0.09 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 2004 1490 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — -0.24
19 2004 1451 99.1 — — — — +21 — — 27.3% -1.82 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.09 2005 1505 106.3 -0.89 -0.92 0.800 44.9% +33 — — 39.1% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.01
20 2005 1573 115.2 — — — — +3 -61 — 60.0% +0.80 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.28 2006 1526 120.2 +0.10 -0.37 1.017 49.8% +30 -49 — 40.0% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.40
21 2006 1485 107.1 -2.70 -1.75 0.860 47.0% -6 +46 +98 32.0% -1.34 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.8 -0.22 2007 1492 108.0 -2.28 -2.33 0.832 46.0% +32 — — 31.6% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01
22 2007 1545 115.4 -0.92 0.00 0.986 49.7% +10 -16 — 37.8% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 2–0 — +1.05 2008 1504 102.0 +0.67 +1.36 0.876 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.04
23 2008 1529 118.0 -2.92 -0.04 0.910 47.8% +35 -11 — 31.9% -1.15 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1487 98.3 -0.13 -1.41 0.855 46.2% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1496 98.7 -4.24 -2.37 0.747 44.1% — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1622 114.1 -2.13 -0.50 0.916 48.1% +14 -3 +98 36.5% -0.88 13–16 (45%) 10–5 (67%) 102.5 +1.58 — 1578 114.5 -0.50 -0.76 0.943 48.3% +31 -49 — 37.7% -0.88 7–9 (44%) 5–9 (36%) 95.6 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.