H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 0-2
Ray Ruffels holds a 2–0 lead over Antonio Munoz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ray Ruffels leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1970 London / Queen's Club second round 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1970* | London / Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1968* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-4 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |