H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

David Wheaton vs Brad Gilbert H2H: 0-6

Brad Gilbert holds a 6–0 lead over David Wheaton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brad Gilbert leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Brad Gilbert won the 1992 Queen's Club Championships round of 16 6-4 5-7 11-9.

USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 6
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brad Gilbert #16 6-4 5-7 11-9 David Wheaton #18 Match data Jun 12, 1992* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Brad Gilbert #10 6-4 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) David Wheaton #34 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Brad Gilbert #10 6-3 3-6 7-6 2-6 6-4 David Wheaton #27 Match data Dec 16, 1990* SF Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals Carpet
Brad Gilbert #7 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #47 Match data Aug 9, 1990* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Brad Gilbert #6 6-7 3-6 6-1 6-4 13-11 David Wheaton #35 Match data Jul 4, 1990* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Brad Gilbert #11 5-7 7-6 6-4 David Wheaton #122 Match data Aug 5, 1989* SF Stratton Mountain ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3
Brad Gilbert #1,263 #4 1,786 2,056 506 276 64.7% 0 0 0 1 19 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age David Wheaton Brad Gilbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% 1,538 0 0
20 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0 1982 19–13 59.4% #54 1,711 0 1
21 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1 1983 33–27 55.0% #62 1,755 0 1
22 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2 1984 39–23 62.9% #23 1,849 0 3
23 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2 1985 53–22 70.7% #18 1,893 0 6
24 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2 1986 45–14 76.3% #11 2,010 0 10
25 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3 1987 55–23 70.5% #13 1,960 0 11
26 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3 1988 30–15 66.7% #21 1,892 0 12
27 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3 1989 58–17 77.3% #6 1,989 0 17
28 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3 1990 46–19 70.8% #10 1,956 0 20
29 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3 1991 34–21 61.8% #19 1,854 0 20
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3 1992 39–26 60.0% #26 1,762 0 20
31 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3 1993 31–26 54.4% #35 1,736 0 20
32 1994 18–20 47.4% #76 1,622 0 20
33 1995 1–5 16.7% #680 1,560 0 20

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age David Wheaton Brad Gilbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1983 15 14 29 51.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
22 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1984 19 9 28 67.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9%
23 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1985 32 9 41 78.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 8 21 61.9%
24 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 30 7 37 81.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 41 11 52 78.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
26 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 40 8 48 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
28 1997 8 6 14 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 25 10 35 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
29 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8%
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 25 16 41 61.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 23 17 40 57.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1994 16 14 30 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4% 321 149 470 68.3% 36 35 71 50.7% 30 21 51 58.8% 119 71 190 62.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 269/322 of David Wheaton's and 203/221 of Brad Gilbert's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age David Wheaton Brad Gilbert
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3% —/—
23 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8% —/—
24 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% —/—
25 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4% —/—
26 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0% —/—
27 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2% —/—
28 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4% —/—
29 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7% 1991 53/55 5.9 3.0 57.0% 74.6% 49.8% 55.2% 45.1% 63.9% 41.1%
30 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1% 1992 60/65 5.6 3.4 57.7% 72.4% 49.4% 62.9% 47.2% 62.8% 40.4%
31 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3% 1993 52/57 4.7 4.0 55.9% 71.6% 46.0% 58.7% 44.7% 60.3% 38.4%
32 —/— 1994 32/38 6.4 4.4 54.3% 68.9% 47.9% 61.4% 44.5% 58.9% 38.8%
33 —/— 1995 6/6 3.2 5.3 50.1% 71.9% 40.9% 45.3% 49.2% 56.0% 32.8%
Career 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5% 203/782 5.5 3.7 56.3% 72.2% 48.1% 59.0% 45.6% 61.6% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age David Wheaton Brad Gilbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1493 101.5 0.0% -2.50 -0.05
18 1987 1525 127.6 +28 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 -0.15
19 1988 1494 102.6 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 -0.14 1981 1539 115.9 +37 +3 54.2% +0.29 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) +1.40
20 1989 1684 136.0 +1 -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) -1.35 1982 1711 128.9 +36 -166 53.2% +0.34 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) +3.49
21 1990 1874 150.4 -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) -1.34 1983 1755 139.6 +45 -180 -152 55.0% +0.35 8–12 (40%) 9–13 (41%) +0.52
22 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) -4.05 1984 1850 149.5 +41 -238 -166 58.2% +0.68 12–6 (67%) 10–2 (83%) +1.44
23 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) +0.32 1985 1893 156.7 +64 -196 -244 66.9% +1.09 9–4 (69%) 10–5 (67%) -1.39
24 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) -1.90 1986 2010 155.6 +53 -304 71.3% +1.25 8–8 (50%) 8–5 (62%) -1.05
25 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) -1.67 1987 1960 156.6 +62 -306 -271 65.2% +0.99 13–9 (59%) 14–10 (58%) -1.22
26 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) +0.22 1988 1892 149.8 +48 -233 65.5% +1.01 4–8 (33%) 9–7 (56%) -1.11
27 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) +0.53 1989 1989 161.9 +43 -294 70.1% +1.11 17–11 (61%) 21–9 (70%) -2.28
28 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) +0.20 1990 1957 155.8 +31 -248 -181 63.5% +0.96 14–6 (70%) 9–9 (50%) +0.79
29 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) +0.22 1991 1854 152.6 +2.35 +2.76 1.137 52.4% +49 -81 58.9% +0.67 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) +0.61
30 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% 0.0% -3.50 +0.26 1992 1763 144.3 +0.88 +2.28 1.085 51.6% +29 +50 58.1% +0.60 14–13 (52%) 14–14 (50%) +1.15
31 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) -0.27 1993 1737 137.0 -0.17 +0.74 0.967 49.4% 0 -90 +31 49.0% -0.10 19–9 (68%) 19–8 (70%) +0.09
32 1994 1622 133.2 -2.08 +0.66 0.943 49.2% +29 +12 46.7% -0.14 6–4 (60%) 7–8 (47%) +0.97
33 1995 1561 107.9 -3.03 -2.86 0.745 45.4% +30 20.0% -1.73 1–0 0–3 (0%) +0.18
Career 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18 2057 155.0 +0.41 +1.60 1.031 50.7% +42 -188 -127 60.6% +0.70 144–109 (57%) 144–106 (58%) 102.4 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.