H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jason Jung vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jason Jung vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jason Jung
Chinese Taipei Age 37 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 7-6(3) 6-2 Jason Jung #280 Match data Mar 12, 2015 Q1 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jason Jung #1,071 #114 500 1,668 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jason Jung Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2017 0–2 0.0% #239 1,465 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2018 2–3 40.0% #121 1,531 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2019 2–6 25.0% #127 1,559 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2020 3–6 33.3% #132 1,600 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2021 2–3 40.0% #178 1,537 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #244 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jason Jung Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2019 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 16 22 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jason Jung Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2017 2/2 4.0 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 49.1% 44.4% 75.0% 54.8% 31.3% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2018 5/5 4.2 4.0 68.0% 62.8% 51.2% 65.1% 42.6% 59.2% 33.4% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2019 8/8 3.3 2.3 64.9% 66.4% 55.2% 51.9% 32.2% 62.0% 32.2% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2020 9/9 3.2 1.9 65.0% 67.4% 47.0% 44.1% 40.1% 60.3% 35.3% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2021 5/5 3.2 3.2 65.2% 70.5% 44.0% 65.8% 30.5% 61.6% 36.2% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
34 2023 3/3 1.3 2.3 59.3% 57.1% 46.4% 45.2% 18.2% 52.7% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32/32 3.3 2.6 64.8% 65.3% 49.3% 52.8% 37.1% 59.7% 33.7% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jason Jung Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2013 1475 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2014 1504 109.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2015 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2017 1466 99.2 -1.95 -2.05 0.694 43.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.09 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2018 1532 109.6 -1.26 -2.42 0.819 47.0% — — +87 38.5% -0.85 1–1 0–1 — +0.05 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2019 1559 117.1 -2.28 -1.30 0.845 47.3% +24 — — 35.0% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.22 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2020 1600 135.9 -1.90 -0.10 0.889 47.4% +31 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.21 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2021 1538 108.2 -2.40 -0.54 0.941 48.6% — — +68 36.4% -0.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.76 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2022 1529 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1528 110.8 -3.54 -0.93 0.665 41.8% -1 — — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 117.0 -2.13 -1.03 0.837 46.8% +23 — +79 33.8% -1.06 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 99.3 +3.81 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.