H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jason Jung vs Marius Copil
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jason Jung vs Marius Copil.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chinese Taipei
Age 37
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason Jung | #1,071 | #114 | 500 | 1,668 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jason Jung | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |