H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jason Jung vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 1-0

Jason Jung holds a 1–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jason Jung leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jason Jung won the 2021 Newport round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jason Jung
Chinese Taipei Age 37 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tennys Sandgren
USA Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jason Jung #163 6-2 6-2 Tennys Sandgren #78 Match data Jul 16, 2021* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jason Jung #1,071 #114 500 1,668 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tennys Sandgren #1,243 #41 1,091 1,872 47 76 38.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jason Jung Tennys Sandgren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
25 — — — — — — — 2017 2–6 25.0% #96 1,498 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2018 16–20 44.4% #61 1,662 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2019 13–17 43.3% #68 1,763 0 1
28 2017 0–2 0.0% #239 1,465 0 0 2020 8–13 38.1% #49 1,758 0 1
29 2018 2–3 40.0% #121 1,531 0 0 2021 8–16 33.3% #96 1,686 0 1
30 2019 2–6 25.0% #127 1,559 0 0 2022 0–3 0.0% #265 1,673 0 1
31 2020 3–6 33.3% #132 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2021 2–3 40.0% #178 1,537 0 0 2024 0–1 0.0% #506 1,645 0 1
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #244 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jason Jung Tennys Sandgren
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 10 19 47.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2019 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2020 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 16 22 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 30 47 77 39.0% 9 21 30 30.0% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/32 of Jason Jung's and 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jason Jung Tennys Sandgren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 8/8 4.6 1.5 62.3% 74.5% 45.2% 61.2% 33.5% 63.4% 32.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 36/36 8.3 2.5 60.9% 74.5% 49.9% 63.9% 46.0% 64.8% 34.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 30/30 9.0 2.9 60.3% 73.0% 47.9% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 35.0%
28 2017 2/2 4.0 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 49.1% 44.4% 75.0% 54.8% 31.3% 2020 21/21 11.7 3.2 62.5% 74.3% 50.1% 68.5% 35.4% 65.1% 32.4%
29 2018 5/5 4.2 4.0 68.0% 62.8% 51.2% 65.1% 42.6% 59.2% 33.4% 2021 23/24 7.8 2.7 58.7% 70.5% 45.3% 51.1% 34.4% 60.1% 32.7%
30 2019 8/8 3.3 2.3 64.9% 66.4% 55.2% 51.9% 32.2% 62.0% 32.2% 2022 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.3% 72.7% 42.1% 47.5% 10.0% 58.9% 28.8%
31 2020 9/9 3.2 1.9 65.0% 67.4% 47.0% 44.1% 40.1% 60.3% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5/5 3.2 3.2 65.2% 70.5% 44.0% 65.8% 30.5% 61.6% 36.2% 2024 1/1 13.0 0.0 65.8% 73.1% 40.7% 66.7% 25.0% 62.0% 29.5%
34 2023 3/3 1.3 2.3 59.3% 57.1% 46.4% 45.2% 18.2% 52.7% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32/32 3.3 2.6 64.8% 65.3% 49.3% 52.8% 37.1% 59.7% 33.7% — 122/123 8.6 2.7 60.6% 73.3% 48.0% 60.2% 38.0% 63.3% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jason Jung Tennys Sandgren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1485 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1473 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1465 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1444 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1428 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 1475 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1429 106.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 1504 109.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1499 115.3 -0.12 -0.71 0.884 47.3% -3 +27 — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 2–0 — -0.15
26 2015 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1663 141.8 +0.68 -1.43 0.972 49.7% +3 -100 — 44.4% -0.24 4–5 (44%) 9–14 (39%) 102.2 +0.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1764 140.9 -0.64 -0.88 0.948 49.1% -62 — +8 47.1% -0.32 3–6 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 96.7 +0.01
28 2017 1466 99.2 -1.95 -2.05 0.694 43.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.09 2020 1758 142.5 +1.13 -2.00 0.928 49.0% -36 -116 — 45.3% -0.20 3–7 (30%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 -0.26
29 2018 1532 109.6 -1.26 -2.42 0.819 47.0% — — +87 38.5% -0.85 1–1 0–1 — +0.05 2021 1687 130.0 -1.47 -2.11 0.820 47.0% -7 -100 +53 32.7% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.96
30 2019 1559 117.1 -2.28 -1.30 0.845 47.3% +24 — — 35.0% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.22 2022 1674 119.3 -1.51 -2.44 0.700 44.1% -10 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.51
31 2020 1600 135.9 -1.90 -0.10 0.889 47.4% +31 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.21 2023 1634 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1538 108.2 -2.40 -0.54 0.941 48.6% — — +68 36.4% -0.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.76 2024 1645 105.5 +1.35 -1.03 0.776 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01
33 2022 1529 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1528 110.8 -3.54 -0.93 0.665 41.8% -1 — — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 117.0 -2.13 -1.03 0.837 46.8% +23 — +79 33.8% -1.06 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 99.3 +3.81 — 1872 138.2 -0.07 -1.50 0.913 48.6% -25 -89 +27 41.1% -0.57 12–23 (34%) 30–42 (42%) 95.4 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.