H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jurij Rodionov vs Dennis Novak H2H: 0-2
Dennis Novak holds a 2–0 lead over Jurij Rodionov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dennis Novak leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dennis Novak won the 2019 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Austria
Age 27
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Austria
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2023 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Jurij Rodionov | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Dennis Novak | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2019* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dennis Novak | 6-3 6-4 | Jurij Rodionov | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dennis Novak | 6-4 0-6 6-1 | Jurij Rodionov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurij Rodionov | #143 | #87 | 666 | 1,644 | 13 | 25 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dennis Novak | #534 | #85 | 785 | 1,737 | 15 | 43 | 25.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurij Rodionov | Dennis Novak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #136 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #140 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #108 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #96 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #119 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |