H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jurij Rodionov vs Norbert Gombos H2H: 0-1
Norbert Gombos holds a 1–0 lead over Jurij Rodionov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Norbert Gombos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Norbert Gombos won the 2020 Roland Garros second round 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Austria
Age 27
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Norbert Gombos | 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Jurij Rodionov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurij Rodionov | #143 | #87 | 666 | 1,644 | 13 | 25 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Norbert Gombos | #370 | #80 | 912 | 1,794 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurij Rodionov | Norbert Gombos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #136 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #132 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #88 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #118 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |