H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marcelo Rios vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 0-1

Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2002 Croatia Open Umag round of 32 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcelo Rios
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 45 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Hanescu #185 6-0 6-4 Marcelo Rios #27 Match data Jul 18, 2002* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,129 366 180 67.0% 0 5 1 2 10 18
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 187 228 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcelo Rios Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,837 0 4 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,869 0 5 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,963 0 12 2004 17–24 41.5% #92 1,560 0 0
23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,918 0 15 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,726 0 0
24 2000 28–20 58.3% #37 1,796 0 16 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,651 0 0
25 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,839 0 18 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18 2008 21–22 48.8% #50 1,759 0 1
27 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,822 0 18 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,706 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,688 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,734 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcelo Rios Victor Hanescu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 18 10 28 64.3% 28 10 38 73.7% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 2002 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 23 11 34 67.6% 23 9 32 71.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 33 9 42 78.6% 23 5 28 82.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2004 4 8 12 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 20 8 28 71.4% 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2001 23 11 34 67.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
26 2002 25 11 36 69.4% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 10 14 24 41.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2003 6 3 9 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 17 26 34.6% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 8 10 18 44.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 7 9 22.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 14 18 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 7 11 36.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 172 84 256 67.2% 164 74 238 68.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 26 16 42 61.9% — 52 97 149 34.9% 121 106 227 53.3% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/546 of Marcelo Rios's and 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcelo Rios Victor Hanescu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1994 20/23 3.7 2.1 60.5% 65.5% 52.6% 49.4% 48.5% 60.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 55/58 3.1 2.0 62.5% 69.4% 55.4% 59.3% 44.6% 64.1% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 69/77 4.3 2.7 52.3% 73.2% 53.0% 54.8% 48.7% 63.5% 40.2% 2002 5/6 2.8 1.6 60.7% 63.8% 54.1% 61.2% 48.1% 59.8% 38.9%
21 1997 62/80 5.2 3.1 54.3% 71.9% 53.9% 58.8% 43.0% 63.7% 40.0% 2003 25/25 4.1 2.3 65.8% 70.6% 50.5% 63.4% 48.4% 64.0% 36.3%
22 1998 69/84 4.8 2.1 59.2% 76.8% 57.1% 63.8% 47.6% 68.7% 44.8% 2004 40/41 6.5 2.3 67.5% 69.3% 50.8% 63.0% 45.0% 63.2% 35.3%
23 1999 51/61 3.8 3.6 55.5% 70.9% 53.9% 56.5% 43.7% 63.2% 42.0% 2005 47/47 5.5 1.4 68.9% 69.0% 51.8% 70.5% 41.2% 63.4% 36.2%
24 2000 43/48 6.1 3.8 55.1% 72.7% 53.6% 62.1% 42.8% 64.1% 39.2% 2006 6/6 5.2 2.8 64.0% 60.4% 48.5% 47.6% 37.8% 56.3% 33.4%
25 2001 39/47 5.2 3.2 58.4% 72.0% 51.3% 60.6% 48.9% 63.3% 40.2% 2007 12/14 4.3 0.8 72.3% 74.1% 51.9% 69.3% 27.0% 67.9% 34.5%
26 2002 41/50 5.9 2.9 60.8% 70.2% 51.2% 59.0% 50.6% 62.7% 38.1% 2008 40/43 5.6 1.6 69.2% 71.7% 52.4% 60.3% 44.5% 65.6% 33.9%
27 2003 17/18 3.5 2.1 65.0% 73.6% 52.4% 56.3% 39.8% 66.5% 44.1% 2009 56/56 4.6 1.7 69.2% 69.7% 51.5% 62.3% 41.8% 64.0% 36.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 47/47 6.2 1.6 71.8% 71.0% 50.9% 60.8% 34.6% 65.3% 35.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 40/40 3.9 1.8 67.2% 69.6% 50.1% 47.9% 43.3% 63.3% 36.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 19/19 3.3 1.0 72.5% 65.7% 48.9% 58.7% 41.8% 61.5% 34.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 3.6 1.1 70.4% 68.7% 50.1% 56.0% 37.4% 63.3% 34.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 26/26 3.6 1.7 70.6% 67.4% 44.8% 59.5% 35.3% 60.8% 34.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 8.0 1.0 62.6% 80.9% 60.3% 80.0% 25.0% 73.0% 34.6%
Career — 466/546 4.6 2.8 57.5% 72.1% 53.8% 58.7% 46.1% 64.3% 41.0% — 408/415 4.8 1.6 69.1% 69.5% 50.6% 60.6% 40.7% 63.7% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcelo Rios Victor Hanescu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1616 137.6 +0.45 +1.49 1.032 50.6% -52 +21 — 55.0% +0.22 3–7 (30%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1771 143.6 +2.61 +2.16 1.134 52.1% -64 +64 -204 62.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 15–7 (68%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1838 152.6 +2.05 +2.33 1.101 51.6% -34 +60 — 61.9% +0.60 14–6 (70%) 18–8 (69%) — +2.50 2002 1520 111.3 -1.52 +0.27 0.969 49.8% — +31 — 45.5% +0.18 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
21 1997 1870 152.1 +2.50 +1.54 1.103 51.7% +18 +34 -203 62.1% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 16–20 (44%) — +2.15 2003 1667 132.9 +1.94 -0.77 1.011 50.6% -105 +5 -57 53.1% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.42
22 1998 1963 161.2 +5.86 +6.49 1.429 55.9% +47 +47 — 74.9% +1.61 6–7 (46%) 13–6 (68%) — +0.31 2004 1560 128.8 -0.24 -1.30 0.958 49.7% -32 +93 +47 46.5% -0.03 6–8 (43%) 8–15 (35%) — +0.44
23 1999 1918 149.7 +1.16 +3.33 1.141 52.4% +10 +119 — 68.0% +0.95 13–3 (81%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.91 2005 1726 141.2 +1.10 -0.69 0.991 50.2% -160 +87 -103 53.4% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 8–13 (38%) — -1.50
24 2000 1797 147.3 +2.03 +1.16 1.090 51.4% +20 +166 — 61.5% +0.77 7–9 (44%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.74 2006 1652 114.7 -3.84 +0.04 0.766 45.3% -130 — — 27.8% -1.22 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.83
25 2001 1839 143.7 +1.20 +2.08 1.095 51.6% +26 -19 — 57.9% +0.52 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.04 2007 1684 130.9 +2.01 -1.85 1.073 50.8% — +100 — 45.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.76
26 2002 1820 149.1 +0.99 +1.31 1.023 50.6% +48 -37 — 63.5% +0.74 7–5 (58%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.28 2008 1759 132.7 +1.60 -1.73 0.986 49.9% -112 +21 -132 48.6% -0.22 8–8 (50%) 16–11 (59%) — +0.07
27 2003 1823 138.3 +2.95 +4.36 1.313 55.0% +78 -41 — 69.7% +1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.79 2009 1707 142.8 +0.72 -0.19 1.018 50.3% -92 +118 -52 49.3% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 8–13 (38%) — +0.84
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1707 144.8 +1.68 -1.00 1.022 50.3% -64 +74 -20 50.8% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.47
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1688 139.6 +0.41 -0.16 1.005 49.9% -77 +67 +2 44.4% -0.26 5–10 (33%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1618 128.5 -0.92 -2.05 0.900 48.2% -12 +62 — 33.3% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.65
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1688 146.6 +0.21 -1.64 0.946 48.9% -114 +151 — 37.8% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 8–14 (36%) — -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1735 145.7 -1.09 -0.75 0.889 48.4% -68 +108 — 43.9% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.73
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1655 110.2 +1.39 -2.44 1.279 52.9% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.07
Career — 2130 155.6 +2.44 +2.75 1.148 52.4% +15 +57 -203 64.3% +0.85 88–58 (60%) 121–76 (61%) 107.0 +1.12 — 1843 144.0 +0.61 -0.96 0.980 49.8% -93 +83 -39 46.7% -0.17 52–74 (41%) 90–107 (46%) 97.3 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.