H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Chiudinelli vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-2
Daniel Brands holds a 2–0 lead over Marco Chiudinelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2017 Sofia third round 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2017* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2013* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Brands | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2013 | Dubai | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Chiudinelli | #1,153 | #52 | 816 | 1,792 | 44 | 85 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Chiudinelli | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #155 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #487 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #605 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #56 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #117 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |