H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Chiudinelli vs Rik De Voest H2H: 0-1
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Chiudinelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2004 Indianapolis third round 1-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 | Dubai | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Marco Chiudinelli | 6-4 6-1 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2012* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Marco Chiudinelli | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2004 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Chiudinelli | #1,153 | #52 | 816 | 1,792 | 44 | 85 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Chiudinelli | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #155 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #487 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #605 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #56 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #117 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |