H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Alessandro Giannessi H2H: 1-0
Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Alessandro Giannessi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2017 Metz third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 36
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-3 6-2 | Alessandro Giannessi | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2013 | Bucharest | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Marius Copil | 6-3 7-6(5) | Alessandro Giannessi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alessandro Giannessi | #1,488 | #84 | 610 | 1,639 | 12 | 22 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marius Copil | Alessandro Giannessi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #135 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #154 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |