H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 3-0

Martin Klizan holds a 3–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Klizan leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2016 Hamburg Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Klizan #47 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #156 Match data Jul 16, 2016* QF Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Martin Klizan #41 6-2 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #95 Match data Apr 12, 2015* F Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Martin Klizan #38 6-3 5-7 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #90 Match data Feb 6, 2015* R16 Quito ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.