H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs David Guez

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Martin Klizan vs David Guez.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
David Guez
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Klizan #212 7-6(5) 6-2 David Guez #137 Match data Apr 5, 2010 Q2 Q Casablanca ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
David Guez #546 #116 449 1,641 2 16 11.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan David Guez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2007 0–2 0.0% #184 1,517 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2008 0–2 0.0% #205 1,525 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2009 2–2 50.0% #146 1,599 0 0
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2010 0–5 0.0% #169 1,581 0 0
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2011 0–1 0.0% #197 1,581 0 0
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–2 0.0% #209 1,550 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #168 1,595 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #420 1,578 0 0
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan David Guez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — 2 12 14 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 18/18 of David Guez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan David Guez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2007 2/2 2.0 1.5 55.9% 62.6% 43.3% 50.0% 45.0% 53.9% 30.3%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2008 2/2 1.0 1.5 57.3% 61.7% 49.4% 41.4% 20.0% 56.5% 28.5%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2009 4/4 1.0 2.5 53.0% 58.6% 54.9% 58.2% 40.5% 56.9% 38.0%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2010 5/5 0.2 2.4 59.2% 58.4% 49.3% 38.9% 62.0% 54.9% 30.9%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 55.7% 61.8% 48.1% 55.6% 40.0% 55.7% 36.0%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 3.5 0.5 61.7% 57.3% 37.1% 41.9% 46.4% 49.4% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.1% 63.0% 61.1% 25.0% 20.0% 62.2% 35.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.6% 58.5% 51.3% 50.0% 25.0% 55.4% 38.5%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 18/18 1.3 2.1 57.1% 59.6% 49.2% 45.8% 43.3% 55.3% 33.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan David Guez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80 2005 1481 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11 2007 1517 108.8 -1.82 -1.25 0.657 44.0% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15 2008 1525 100.6 +0.91 -2.26 0.654 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22 2009 1600 116.8 -0.98 +2.39 0.881 47.6% +38 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.15
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38 2010 1582 115.2 -2.68 -1.94 0.685 43.4% +26 — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.05
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08 2011 1581 107.2 -0.92 -0.41 0.813 45.7% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–0 — -0.02
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18 2012 1565 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2013 1500 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1550 115.1 -2.56 +1.50 0.700 42.8% — — — 16.7% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1595 115.0 -0.41 +2.01 0.930 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1578 104.5 -3.17 -1.07 0.863 46.4% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.27
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 2018 1546 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1641 113.0 -1.60 -0.20 0.751 44.8% +33 — — 23.4% -1.74 0–5 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 93.7 -0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.