Martin Klizan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Feb 27, 2020 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Dominic Thiem | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 17, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Filip Krajinovic holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Hamburg Open second round 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | Martin Klizan | Match data | Jul 26, 2019* | R16 | Hamburg Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 147 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,979 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #30 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,930 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,797 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,757 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,900 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,648 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,555 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2014 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2014 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2017 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2017 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2018 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58 | 79 | 137 | 42.3% | 66 | 55 | 121 | 54.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | 74 | 81 | 155 | 47.7% | 36 | 38 | 74 | 48.6% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 237/240 of Filip Krajinovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2007 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 50.7% | 64.2% | 50.8% | 61.7% | 45.0% | 58.5% | 41.6% | 2009 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 59.0% | 55.6% | 36.0% | 41.7% | 57.1% | 47.5% | 43.8% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6/6 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 61.3% | 61.1% | 49.0% | 31.7% | 25.5% | 56.8% | 38.0% |
| 19 | 2009 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 44.4% | 64.3% | 37.1% | 44.4% | 30.0% | 49.2% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 7.3 | 48.1% | 67.9% | 41.9% | 64.6% | 41.1% | 54.6% | 35.4% | 2012 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 58.3% | 50.8% | 36.7% | 32.7% | 76.7% | 45.5% | 36.1% |
| 21 | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 60.6% | 52.6% | 35.0% | 22.7% | 29.2% | 45.7% | 35.2% | 2013 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 57.7% | 75.0% | 45.5% | 78.6% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 34.0% |
| 22 | 2012 | 29/30 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 56.1% | 71.1% | 50.5% | 56.3% | 48.2% | 62.1% | 41.4% | 2014 | 8/8 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 57.1% | 74.4% | 55.1% | 60.9% | 33.8% | 65.5% | 34.3% |
| 23 | 2013 | 36/36 | 6.0 | 3.9 | 54.7% | 67.3% | 48.8% | 60.3% | 40.6% | 58.8% | 36.4% | 2015 | 14/14 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 60.0% | 65.8% | 50.6% | 55.4% | 36.0% | 59.5% | 35.0% |
| 24 | 2014 | 36/39 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 56.9% | 73.3% | 52.4% | 61.3% | 44.3% | 63.9% | 37.9% | 2016 | 5/6 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 67.4% | 56.7% | 41.7% | 51.2% | 19.7% | 51.7% | 33.7% |
| 25 | 2015 | 51/51 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 57.5% | 68.9% | 48.4% | 56.2% | 42.0% | 60.3% | 34.4% | 2017 | 7/8 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 66.6% | 73.5% | 53.0% | 56.0% | 64.8% | 67.1% | 36.1% |
| 26 | 2016 | 29/29 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 58.0% | 69.6% | 49.4% | 58.1% | 49.6% | 60.7% | 38.5% | 2018 | 31/31 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 63.1% | 66.7% | 52.4% | 61.7% | 38.0% | 61.5% | 38.1% |
| 27 | 2017 | 25/25 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 64.7% | 67.0% | 50.6% | 58.0% | 40.2% | 61.2% | 36.6% | 2019 | 44/44 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 65.5% | 70.1% | 52.7% | 61.0% | 46.0% | 64.1% | 38.7% |
| 28 | 2018 | 27/27 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 62.1% | 70.2% | 55.5% | 59.1% | 54.5% | 64.5% | 37.8% | 2020 | 28/28 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 65.0% | 70.8% | 51.6% | 66.0% | 46.3% | 64.0% | 40.7% |
| 29 | 2019 | 27/27 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 58.1% | 67.0% | 47.9% | 55.1% | 48.2% | 58.9% | 35.1% | 2021 | 41/42 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 62.7% | 70.6% | 53.1% | 60.2% | 44.1% | 64.1% | 36.7% |
| 30 | 2020 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 55.6% | 68.0% | 47.9% | 51.4% | 32.5% | 59.0% | 34.8% | 2022 | 33/33 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 63.7% | 68.3% | 53.7% | 60.9% | 48.5% | 62.8% | 35.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15/15 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 64.9% | 62.5% | 50.5% | 45.3% | 40.5% | 58.5% | 31.9% |
| 35 | 2025 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 72.0% | 42.0% | 56.0% | 60.0% | 62.0% | 29.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 271/275 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 58.0% | 69.2% | 50.0% | 57.8% | 45.2% | 60.9% | 37.0% | — | 237/240 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 63.5% | 68.3% | 51.9% | 58.7% | 43.6% | 62.3% | 37.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1469 | 91.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 1524 | 104.9 | -2.40 | -0.79 | 1.001 | 50.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | 2009 | 1481 | 101.7 | -1.43 | -4.20 | 0.834 | 45.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1506 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1508 | 100.4 | -1.60 | +0.61 | 0.880 | 46.7% | — | +89 | — | 38.5% | -1.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.13 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1543 | 104.5 | -2.83 | -2.96 | 0.851 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1607 | 113.5 | +0.26 | +1.44 | 0.780 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.14 | 2012 | 1541 | 108.9 | -1.83 | +0.43 | 0.663 | 41.3% | — | +99 | — | 28.6% | -2.43 | — | — | — | +0.34 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1601 | 108.6 | -3.98 | +3.39 | 0.648 | 40.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | -0.28 | 2013 | 1584 | 113.3 | +2.82 | -1.59 | 0.908 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1793 | 136.2 | -0.83 | +2.99 | 1.092 | 51.5% | -45 | -158 | -236 | 52.6% | +0.10 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.2 | +0.80 | 2014 | 1671 | 126.4 | +0.29 | -1.85 | 0.997 | 50.1% | -62 | +55 | — | 52.9% | +0.29 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1690 | 141.7 | -2.90 | -0.83 | 0.884 | 48.1% | -55 | +13 | -130 | 39.3% | -0.74 | 4–11 (27%) | 6–8 (43%) | 93.2 | +0.17 | 2015 | 1675 | 122.4 | -2.65 | -0.30 | 0.866 | 47.4% | -1 | +17 | — | 27.8% | -1.11 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–5 (0%) | 94.1 | -0.43 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1930 | 145.3 | +0.98 | +1.95 | 1.050 | 51.1% | -137 | +27 | -329 | 56.4% | +0.30 | 10–4 (71%) | 11–8 (58%) | 108.8 | -2.11 | 2016 | 1662 | 111.8 | -3.31 | -2.33 | 0.697 | 43.0% | — | +16 | — | 22.2% | -2.11 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1798 | 145.6 | -2.85 | -1.50 | 0.865 | 47.5% | -11 | +44 | — | 45.3% | -0.62 | 11–6 (65%) | 17–5 (77%) | 110.6 | -0.15 | 2017 | 1779 | 129.6 | +1.67 | +1.48 | 1.099 | 52.0% | +24 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.57 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1753 | 151.0 | -1.88 | +1.38 | 0.979 | 50.0% | +2 | +114 | — | 52.2% | +0.12 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.4 | +1.22 | 2018 | 1759 | 156.1 | -1.36 | +1.87 | 0.990 | 49.7% | +19 | — | — | 48.6% | +0.01 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.4 | +0.72 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1757 | 144.6 | -1.26 | +0.29 | 0.943 | 49.2% | -12 | +78 | — | 47.5% | +0.03 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–9 (40%) | 97.8 | -0.38 | 2019 | 1900 | 160.4 | +0.40 | +2.33 | 1.077 | 51.3% | +13 | -72 | — | 58.5% | +0.48 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–9 (50%) | 104.8 | -2.80 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1918 | 149.4 | +0.58 | +1.54 | 1.064 | 51.4% | -96 | +77 | — | 58.2% | +0.43 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–3 (63%) | 109.8 | -2.08 | 2020 | 1870 | 159.0 | +0.84 | +3.58 | 1.132 | 52.1% | +27 | -68 | — | 55.7% | +0.39 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 95.9 | -0.70 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1702 | 134.3 | -4.15 | -1.03 | 0.853 | 47.6% | +16 | +145 | — | 37.1% | -0.73 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–7 (50%) | 96.8 | -0.18 | 2021 | 1758 | 149.4 | +0.81 | +0.15 | 1.022 | 50.6% | +33 | +79 | — | 45.1% | +0.05 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–11 (31%) | 97.4 | +0.69 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1649 | 111.4 | -0.19 | -1.33 | 0.847 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 | 2022 | 1829 | 148.5 | -0.77 | -0.15 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -61 | +34 | -179 | 47.0% | -0.11 | 6–2 (75%) | 9–9 (50%) | 104.9 | -0.67 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1541 | 88.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1675 | 118.7 | -3.08 | -2.02 | 0.768 | 45.9% | +36 | +15 | — | 25.6% | -1.72 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.1 | -0.87 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1640 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1556 | 101.9 | -0.23 | -0.93 | 0.763 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1980 | 146.1 | -1.61 | +0.42 | 0.947 | 49.3% | -39 | +43 | -241 | 47.5% | -0.22 | 52–48 (52%) | 59–55 (52%) | 103.7 | -1.16 | — | 1980 | 148.7 | -0.39 | +0.89 | 0.981 | 49.7% | +11 | +27 | -179 | 47.4% | -0.12 | 37–34 (52%) | 38–53 (42%) | 97.8 | -1.31 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | 3 | 4 | 7 | Sep 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Feb 27, 2020 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Dominic Thiem | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goffin | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Dusan Lajovic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 20, 2023 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 1, 2023 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 28, 2022 | H2H |
| Frances Tiafoe | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2023 | H2H |