H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 0-1
Filip Krajinovic holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Hamburg fourth round 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Filip Krajinovic | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | Martin Klizan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |