H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Guilherme Clezar H2H: 1-0
Martin Klizan holds a 1–0 lead over Guilherme Clezar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2014 Sao Paulo third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Klizan | 6-4 6-3 | Guilherme Clezar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Guilherme Clezar | #1,365 | #153 | 334 | 1,566 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Klizan | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #232 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |