H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-2

Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-0 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #81 3-6 6-0 6-3 6-4 Martin Klizan #56 Match data Jul 3, 2019* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jeremy Chardy #27 7-5 6-4 7-6(1) Martin Klizan #36 Match data Sep 3, 2015* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martin Klizan #52 6-4 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #32 Match data Sep 2, 2012* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Klizan Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 271/275 of Martin Klizan's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Klizan Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Klizan Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.2 +0.80 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 93.2 +0.17 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) 108.8 -2.11 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) 110.6 -0.15 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 99.4 +1.22 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 -0.38 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 109.8 -2.08 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.18 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
35 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.