H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Martin Klizan vs Ze Zhang H2H: 1-0
Martin Klizan holds a 1–0 lead over Ze Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Klizan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2015 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(8) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martin Klizan | 7-6(8) 6-2 | Ze Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Ze Zhang | #1,385 | #148 | 374 | 1,586 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Martin Klizan | Ze Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |