H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Matthew Ebden vs Bradley Klahn
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Matthew Ebden vs Bradley Klahn.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthew Ebden | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |