H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 2-1
Milos Raonic holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2014 Australian Open second round 7-6(9) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(9) 6-4 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2012* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-1 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2010* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Victor Hanescu | 6-4 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |