H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mirza Basic vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 0-1

Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Mirza Basic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2018 Geneva Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mirza Basic
Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tennys Sandgren
USA Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tennys Sandgren #55 6-3 6-2 Mirza Basic #82 Match data May 24, 2018* R16 Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirza Basic #480 #74 733 1,775 22 29 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tennys Sandgren #1,243 #41 1,091 1,872 47 76 38.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirza Basic Tennys Sandgren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2013 2–2 50.0% #248 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2014 0–1 0.0% #271 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2016 3–4 42.9% #181 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2017 3–1 75.0% #138 1,613 0 0 2017 2–6 25.0% #96 1,498 0 0
26 2018 13–17 43.3% #87 1,609 0 1 2018 16–20 44.4% #61 1,662 0 0
27 2019 0–2 0.0% #294 1,561 0 1 2019 13–17 43.3% #68 1,763 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2020 8–13 38.1% #49 1,758 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2021 8–16 33.3% #96 1,686 0 1
30 2022 1–2 33.3% #392 1,526 0 1 2022 0–3 0.0% #265 1,673 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #506 1,645 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirza Basic Tennys Sandgren
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 9 10 19 47.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2022 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 16 31 48.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — 30 47 77 39.0% 9 21 30 30.0% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Mirza Basic's and 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mirza Basic Tennys Sandgren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2013 4/4 5.5 1.8 63.1% 69.2% 52.0% 72.3% 34.6% 63.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1/1 3.0 3.0 62.1% 59.4% 33.3% 42.9% 54.5% 49.5% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 6/7 5.3 1.8 55.2% 71.6% 51.9% 67.8% 32.2% 62.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 4/4 5.8 2.5 54.2% 73.1% 56.6% 71.6% 47.1% 65.5% 43.3% 2017 8/8 4.6 1.5 62.3% 74.5% 45.2% 61.2% 33.5% 63.4% 32.4%
26 2018 29/30 5.7 1.9 58.6% 70.6% 53.0% 57.0% 39.4% 63.1% 32.1% 2018 36/36 8.3 2.5 60.9% 74.5% 49.9% 63.9% 46.0% 64.8% 34.2%
27 2019 2/2 5.0 4.0 59.1% 68.0% 46.3% 30.8% 72.2% 59.0% 33.1% 2019 30/30 9.0 2.9 60.3% 73.0% 47.9% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 35.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 21/21 11.7 3.2 62.5% 74.3% 50.1% 68.5% 35.4% 65.1% 32.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/24 7.8 2.7 58.7% 70.5% 45.3% 51.1% 34.4% 60.1% 32.7%
30 2022 3/3 4.0 1.0 55.8% 65.9% 54.3% 47.8% 28.9% 61.1% 33.0% 2022 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.3% 72.7% 42.1% 47.5% 10.0% 58.9% 28.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 13.0 0.0 65.8% 73.1% 40.7% 66.7% 25.0% 62.0% 29.5%
Career — 49/51 5.4 2.0 58.1% 70.2% 52.5% 58.8% 39.7% 62.7% 33.6% — 122/123 8.6 2.7 60.6% 73.3% 48.0% 60.2% 38.0% 63.3% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirza Basic Tennys Sandgren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2008 1483 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1485 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1500 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1505 106.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1473 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1575 109.7 -1.03 -2.74 0.836 47.8% — — — 44.4% -0.55 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.25 2013 1465 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1604 105.8 -2.27 +0.13 0.895 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.28 2014 1444 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 1550 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1428 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 1550 105.5 -0.20 -1.50 0.936 49.1% +43 — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 2–0 — +0.03 2016 1429 106.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 1614 106.1 +1.54 +0.52 1.257 54.9% +64 — — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.42 2017 1499 115.3 -0.12 -0.71 0.884 47.3% -3 +27 — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 2–0 — -0.15
26 2018 1610 130.9 -0.90 -2.74 0.869 47.9% +62 -69 -113 40.0% -0.63 5–3 (63%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.96 2018 1663 141.8 +0.68 -1.43 0.972 49.7% +3 -100 — 44.4% -0.24 4–5 (44%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.49
27 2019 1562 112.5 -1.08 -3.34 0.807 46.0% — — — 28.6% -1.57 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2019 1764 140.9 -0.64 -0.88 0.948 49.1% -62 — +8 47.1% -0.32 3–6 (33%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1758 142.5 +1.13 -2.00 0.928 49.0% -36 -116 — 45.3% -0.20 3–7 (30%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.26
29 2021 1530 94.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 130.0 -1.47 -2.11 0.820 47.0% -7 -100 +53 32.7% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.96
30 2022 1527 104.6 -0.21 -1.49 0.849 47.1% — — — 37.5% -0.62 1–1 — — +0.19 2022 1674 119.3 -1.51 -2.44 0.700 44.1% -10 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.51
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1634 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1645 105.5 +1.35 -1.03 0.776 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01
Career — 1775 115.9 -0.62 -2.21 0.900 48.5% +59 -69 -113 40.3% -0.67 8–7 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 104.9 +0.38 — 1872 138.2 -0.07 -1.50 0.913 48.6% -25 -89 +27 41.1% -0.57 12–23 (34%) 30–42 (42%) 95.4 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.