H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rik De Voest vs Stefano Galvani H2H: 1-0
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Galvani in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2011 Johannesburg third round 6-3 5-7 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2012 | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 6-3 5-1 (ret.) | Stefano Galvani | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 6-3 5-7 7-6(6) | Stefano Galvani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefano Galvani | #1,126 | #99 | 439 | 1,671 | 17 | 35 | 32.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Stefano Galvani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #181 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #110 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #171 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #217 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |