H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ronald Agenor vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 0-1

Tim Wilkison holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1985 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Wilkison #44 6-2 6-3 Ronald Agenor #110 Match data Jul 11, 1985* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,897 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ronald Agenor Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
31 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6
34 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ronald Agenor Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ronald Agenor Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1567 122.3 — — — — -3 +28 -30 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +4.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1660 119.2 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.15
19 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.77
20 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.06 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.50
21 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.67 1981 1756 139.5 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.41
22 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.17 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.66
23 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.17 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.94
24 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.70 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.11
25 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.13 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.48
26 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.22 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.92
27 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) — -0.10 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.49
28 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.63 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
29 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.66 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.68
30 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.29 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
31 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
34 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.