H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Victor Hanescu vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-2

Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2009 Stuttgart final 1-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 19, 2009* Stuttgart ATP 250 F Clay Jeremy Chardy #43 1-6 6-3 6-4 Victor Hanescu #33 Match data
Mar 14, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jeremy Chardy #48 6-4 3-6 6-2 Victor Hanescu #37 Match data
Jul 12, 2008* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Victor Hanescu #80 6-3 7-6(3) Jeremy Chardy #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victor Hanescu Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1