H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Victor Hanescu holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Elgin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Hanescu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2008 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | 6-1 6-4 | Mikhail Elgin | Match data | Oct 25, 2008* | QF | St. Petersburg | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 187 | 228 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mikhail Elgin | #1,662 | #127 | 606 | 1,533 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Victor Hanescu | Mikhail Elgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #92 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #679 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #959 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Victor Hanescu | Mikhail Elgin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2002 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2005 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2006 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 52 | 97 | 149 | 34.9% | 121 | 106 | 227 | 53.3% | 13 | 19 | 32 | 40.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | Career | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 408/415 of Victor Hanescu's and 11/12 of Mikhail Elgin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Victor Hanescu | Mikhail Elgin | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2002 | 5/6 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 60.7% | 63.8% | 54.1% | 61.2% | 48.1% | 59.8% | 38.9% | 2001 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 67.6% | 50.0% | 58.3% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 52.7% | 29.6% |
| 2003 | 25/25 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 65.8% | 70.6% | 50.5% | 63.4% | 48.4% | 64.0% | 36.3% | 2002 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 63.5% | 66.7% | 21.1% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 26.4% |
| 2004 | 40/41 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 67.5% | 69.3% | 50.8% | 63.0% | 45.0% | 63.2% | 35.3% | 2004 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 54.3% | 68.0% | 28.6% | 42.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 26.7% |
| 2005 | 47/47 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 68.9% | 69.0% | 51.8% | 70.5% | 41.2% | 63.4% | 36.2% | 2007 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 60.3% | 62.9% | 52.2% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 58.6% | 27.5% |
| 2006 | 6/6 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 64.0% | 60.4% | 48.5% | 47.6% | 37.8% | 56.3% | 33.4% | 2008 | 3/4 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 55.8% | 71.0% | 47.9% | 46.4% | 36.7% | 60.4% | 28.9% |
| 2007 | 12/14 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 72.3% | 74.1% | 51.9% | 69.3% | 27.0% | 67.9% | 34.5% | 2009 | 2/2 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 63.3% | 73.1% | 35.9% | 75.0% | 15.0% | 59.5% | 39.5% |
| 2008 | 40/43 | 5.6 | 1.6 | 69.2% | 71.7% | 52.4% | 60.3% | 44.5% | 65.6% | 33.9% | 2012 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 40.5% | 60.0% | 36.4% | 53.8% | 60.0% | 45.9% | 43.1% |
| 2009 | 56/56 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 69.2% | 69.7% | 51.5% | 62.3% | 41.8% | 64.0% | 36.6% | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 64.5% | 35.0% | 18.2% | 16.7% | 0.0% | 29.0% | 24.4% |
| 2010 | 47/47 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 71.8% | 71.0% | 50.9% | 60.8% | 34.6% | 65.3% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 40/40 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 67.2% | 69.6% | 50.1% | 47.9% | 43.3% | 63.3% | 36.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19/19 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 72.5% | 65.7% | 48.9% | 58.7% | 41.8% | 61.5% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 43/43 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 70.4% | 68.7% | 50.1% | 56.0% | 37.4% | 63.3% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26/26 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 70.6% | 67.4% | 44.8% | 59.5% | 35.3% | 60.8% | 34.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 62.6% | 80.9% | 60.3% | 80.0% | 25.0% | 73.0% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 408/415 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 69.1% | 69.5% | 50.6% | 60.6% | 40.7% | 63.7% | 35.5% | Career | 11/12 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 63.8% | 39.1% | 47.5% | 29.5% | 53.3% | 31.2% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Victor Hanescu | Mikhail Elgin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1520 | 111.3 | -1.52 | +0.27 | 0.969 | 49.8% | — | +31 | — | 45.5% | +0.18 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.18 | 2001 | 1495 | 103.5 | +0.24 | -2.50 | 0.626 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 2003 | 1667 | 132.9 | +1.94 | -0.77 | 1.011 | 50.6% | -105 | +5 | -57 | 53.1% | +0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.42 | 2002 | 1484 | 100.0 | +1.25 | +0.50 | 0.528 | 38.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 2004 | 1560 | 128.8 | -0.24 | -1.30 | 0.958 | 49.7% | -32 | +93 | +47 | 46.5% | -0.03 | 6–8 (43%) | 8–15 (35%) | — | +0.44 | 2004 | 1478 | 98.7 | +0.14 | +3.12 | 0.533 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 2005 | 1726 | 141.2 | +1.10 | -0.69 | 0.991 | 50.2% | -160 | +87 | -103 | 53.4% | +0.33 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–13 (38%) | — | -1.50 | 2007 | 1460 | 100.3 | -0.84 | -1.64 | 0.663 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 2006 | 1652 | 114.7 | -3.84 | +0.04 | 0.766 | 45.3% | -130 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.22 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.83 | 2008 | 1527 | 99.8 | -0.40 | -1.75 | 0.730 | 44.9% | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 2007 | 1684 | 130.9 | +2.01 | -1.85 | 1.073 | 50.8% | — | +100 | — | 45.2% | -0.61 | 1–2 (33%) | 6–2 (75%) | — | -0.76 | 2009 | 1490 | 97.8 | -0.49 | -1.95 | 0.975 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 2008 | 1759 | 132.7 | +1.60 | -1.73 | 0.986 | 49.9% | -112 | +21 | -132 | 48.6% | -0.22 | 8–8 (50%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | +0.07 | 2010 | 1482 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1707 | 142.8 | +0.72 | -0.19 | 1.018 | 50.3% | -92 | +118 | -52 | 49.3% | +0.07 | 7–9 (44%) | 8–13 (38%) | — | +0.84 | 2011 | 1463 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1707 | 144.8 | +1.68 | -1.00 | 1.022 | 50.3% | -64 | +74 | -20 | 50.8% | -0.01 | 6–9 (40%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | +1.47 | 2012 | 1447 | 100.3 | +1.71 | -0.10 | 0.797 | 44.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 2011 | 1688 | 139.6 | +0.41 | -0.16 | 1.005 | 49.9% | -77 | +67 | +2 | 44.4% | -0.26 | 5–10 (33%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -1.38 | 2013 | 1448 | 100.6 | -0.44 | +1.86 | 0.344 | 26.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 2012 | 1618 | 128.5 | -0.92 | -2.05 | 0.900 | 48.2% | -12 | +62 | — | 33.3% | -1.04 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.65 | 2014 | 1427 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1688 | 146.6 | +0.21 | -1.64 | 0.946 | 48.9% | -114 | +151 | — | 37.8% | -0.70 | 2–6 (25%) | 8–14 (36%) | — | -0.88 | 2015 | 1422 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1735 | 145.7 | -1.09 | -0.75 | 0.889 | 48.4% | -68 | +108 | — | 43.9% | -0.53 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.73 | 2016 | 1407 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1655 | 110.2 | +1.39 | -2.44 | 1.279 | 52.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2017 | 1419 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1843 | 144.0 | +0.61 | -0.96 | 0.980 | 49.8% | -93 | +83 | -39 | 46.7% | -0.17 | 52–74 (41%) | 90–107 (46%) | 97.3 | -0.94 | Career | 1534 | 99.7 | -0.01 | -0.72 | 0.669 | 42.4% | +18 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.36 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 5 | 4 | 9 | Mar 14, 2015 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 1, 2013 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 9, 2014 | H2H |
| Jurgen Melzer | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 27, 2009 | H2H |
| Kevin Anderson | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 11, 2014 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernests Gulbis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 19, 2013 | H2H |
| Martin Klizan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2012 | H2H |
| Igor Kunitsyn | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 29, 2009 | H2H |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 28, 2009 | H2H |
| Victor Hanescu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 25, 2008 | H2H |