H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Zeljko Franulovic vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 2-0
Zeljko Franulovic holds a 2–0 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zeljko Franulovic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Zeljko Franulovic won the 1969 Hamburg third round 6-4 9-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1969* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-4 9-7 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1968* | Montana Vermala | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 10-8 13-11 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zeljko Franulovic | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |