H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Agnes Szavay H2H: 2-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–1 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Agnes Szavay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2009 Toronto third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2009* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-1 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2007* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Agnes Szavay | 6-0 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |