H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Alla Kudryavtseva H2H: 2-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Nottingham third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-3 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-2 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Alla Kudryavtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |