H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-2

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 2–0 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Paris quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #24 6-2 6-0 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data Feb 14, 2009* QF Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #24 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) Agnieszka Radwanska #16 Match data Apr 11, 2008* R16 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
Career — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 10/19 1.8 1.6 65.4% 59.8% 46.5% 60.6% 47.1% 55.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 41/46 2.0 1.8 60.6% 62.9% 47.7% 57.5% 43.5% 57.3% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 59/72 1.4 1.4 67.0% 63.2% 46.8% 50.4% 54.4% 57.9% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 64/67 1.5 1.5 66.3% 62.9% 48.9% 52.1% 56.0% 58.2% 48.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 49/50 1.6 1.2 65.6% 64.1% 50.5% 51.5% 47.9% 59.2% 48.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 56/64 2.3 1.2 67.1% 64.4% 51.4% 58.4% 54.0% 59.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 68/79 2.4 1.2 67.3% 66.3% 46.7% 56.9% 56.1% 59.9% 49.0% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2013 69/76 2.4 1.6 64.9% 65.6% 50.7% 55.0% 53.1% 60.4% 48.1% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2014 60/65 2.4 1.3 65.5% 63.3% 48.2% 56.8% 52.0% 58.2% 49.8% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2015 49/72 2.5 1.3 66.7% 68.4% 51.3% 56.8% 54.6% 62.7% 46.7% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2016 60/73 2.8 1.8 62.4% 67.3% 47.7% 60.1% 57.3% 60.0% 49.8% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2017 42/43 2.0 1.6 61.8% 64.9% 45.8% 53.6% 46.7% 57.5% 46.3% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2018 24/29 1.4 1.9 60.8% 59.8% 44.2% 45.6% 42.6% 53.4% 43.2% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
Career — 651/755 2.1 1.5 65.1% 64.6% 48.5% 55.1% 52.4% 59.0% 48.2% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
Career — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.