H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 1-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2006 Warsaw third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Anastasia Myskina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |