H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 3-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2010 Indian Wells third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-0 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2008* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-5 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2008* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 1-6 7-6(1) | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |