H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 4-1

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–1 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Monica Niculescu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2016 Montreal third round 6-1 7-5.

POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-1 7-5 Monica Niculescu #61 Match data
Mar 14, 2016* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-2 6-1 Monica Niculescu #34 Match data
Feb 25, 2016* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #3 7-5 6-1 Monica Niculescu #37 Match data
Jun 13, 2015* Nottingham WTA 250 SF Grass Monica Niculescu #61 5-7 6-4 6-0 Agnieszka Radwanska #13 Match data
Oct 15, 2009* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 6-4 6-2 Monica Niculescu #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3