H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-2

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Tokyo final 6-0 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2012* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Hard Nadia Petrova #18 6-0 1-6 6-3 Agnieszka Radwanska #3 Match data
Oct 25, 2008* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 6-3 6-2 Nadia Petrova #13 Match data
Sep 20, 2008* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #20 6-3 6-0 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data
Jun 22, 2008* Eastbourne WTA 500 F Grass Agnieszka Radwanska #14 6-4 6-7(11) 6-4 Nadia Petrova #22 Match data
Jan 22, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #28 1-6 7-5 6-0 Nadia Petrova #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13