H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 3-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–1 lead over Olga Govortsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2014 Australian Open second round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 7-5 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2012* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 6-0 2-1 (ret.) | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 3-0 (ret.) | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 6-3 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |